1) Why this list matters: get relationship data out of partner inboxes and into an actionable system Managing partners and operations heads, you know the pattern: a senior partner has five email threads with a potential
Data migration looks simple on slide decks: export, transform, import. Reality is messier. Complexities hide in schema drift, hidden business rules, performance limits, and regulatory constraints
Comment 1: I’ve worked with Netguru on a composable commerce rollout, and here’s the thing—their flexibility in custom dev was solid, but once you get past the prototype stage, the question of ownership boundaries really hits hard
<p>‘소액결제 현금화 사업은 불법이다. 정보통신망법은 ‘통신과금서비스사용자로 하여금 통신과금서비스에 의하여 재화등을 구매·이용되도록 한 후 이용자가 구매·이용한 재화등을 할인해서 매입하는 행위에 ‘1년 이하의 징역 또는 3천만원 이하의 벌금에 처하도록 규정하고 있을 것이다.</p>
A stable subgrade, vapor barrier, and correct rebar spacing make slabs more durable and easier to maintain.
Comment 1: I’ve worked with both Netguru and DEPT on composable commerce projects, and here’s the thing: the partnership quality can make or break the entire implementation
<p>포털 다음(Daum)와 다음의 언론사 제휴를 심사하는 포털 뉴스제휴평가위원회가 7월5월 소액 결제 현금화 등 관련 기사를 다수 적은 언론사들을 퇴출했다. 하지만 바로 이후에도 몇몇 언론을 중심으로 이러한 기사가 나타났다 사라지는 일이 반복되고 있는 상황이다.</p>
Comment 1: Look, we’ve worked with Netguru on a composable commerce rollout, and here’s the thing—while their dev expertise is solid, defining clear ownership boundaries between their team and ours was a mess at first
What are the main questions PE leaders have about activity capture and relationship intelligence, and why do they matter? When partners, managing directors, and COOs in private equity firms talk about CRM upgrades, three concerns repeat: